Advantages & Disadvantages of Hydrostatic Skeleton

••• Velvetfish/iStock/GettyImages

A hydrostatic skeleton is one that contains no rigid, hard structures or bones for support, but rather relies on a fluid-filled cavity surrounded by muscles. It is the skeleton adopted by worms, starfish and other invertebrates, and carries with it a number of advantages and disadvantages over a more solid frame.

Fluid Shape

Because of the lack of permanently rigid structures, creatures with hydrostatic skeletons have a relatively flexible shape which often enables them to fit through oddly shaped passages.

Strength

Creatures with hydrostatic skeletons cannot utilize properties of leverage inherent in boned joints, and often do not have the lifting capacity that exo/endoskeletal creatures have. However, they can squeeze between spaces and expand, to allow for a "prying open" movement.

Fragility

If the fluid-filled sac, called a coelom, is punctured, movement is inhibited. The fluid must be fully encased to work properly.

Healing Time

While bones take a long time to heal and may heal improperly, coelomic fluid is made up of mostly water and can be regenerated quickly. This allows many creatures, like earthworms, to grow back a significant portion of their mass after being damaged.

Movement: Peristalsis

Hydrostatic skeletons allow movement through peristaltic motion or by waving flagella. In peristaltic motion, as one portion expands, another contracts, slowly pulling along the creature; peristaltic movement generally is disadvantageous if speed is needed.

Movement: Flagellation

In flagellation, small appendages are waved back and forth to provide thrust in one direction, providing quicker movement than peristalsis.

References

About the Author

Evan St. John is a freelance writer from Austin Texas. St. John graduated from the University of Texas with degrees in English and Linguistics, and is a regular music review columnist on AustinSound.net.

Dont Go!

We Have More Great Sciencing Articles!